Trump’s Response To The California Wildfires Isn’t Simply Inaccurate. It’s Harmful.

Saturday morning, as total California cities had been engulfed in flames, the president retreated to Twitter. He didn’t supply assist, condolences and even prayers for these killed ― the toll is now no less than 63 ― within the deadliest fireplace within the state’s historical past. As an alternative, he supplied an evidence for the wildfires ― California’s “poor forest administration” ― and threatened to withhold federal restoration funds.

Poor forest administration is a nod to logging pursuits and, for causes others have identified, will not be the foundation reason behind California’s year-round wildfire downside.

President Donald Trump’s remark isn’t simply factually inaccurate. It indicators a bigger downside that must be of main concern to these of us who need to forestall future disasters like this one.

Incorrectly putting blame on “poor forest administration” retains the American public from understanding the precise reason behind the wildfires. This issues, as a result of if we don’t perceive our danger, we will’t take the suitable steps to reduce or remove these dangers going ahead.

Firefighters prepare to hose down flames as the Woolsey fire consumes a condo unit in Malibu, California, on Nov. 9, 2018.

Gene Blevins / Reuters

Firefighters put together to dampen flames because the Woolsey fireplace consumes a apartment unit in Malibu, California, on Nov. 9, 2018.

The president’s remark provides to an extended historical past of denying or misunderstanding the causes of disasters. At one level, disasters had been thought-about “acts of God.” They had been regarded as occasions that might not be stopped, retribution for all method of sins.

As science advanced, so too did our understanding of the pure world. With developments in fields like seismology, meteorology and volcanology, we started to grasp that hazards like earthquakes, hurricanes and volcanoes are part of our pure world. A city wasn’t shaking as a result of the residents had angered God; it was shaking as a result of residents had been dwelling subsequent to a fault line. And thus, the time period “acts of God” was changed by “pure disasters.”

In more moderen a long time, catastrophe researchers have constructed on the work of hazard scientists learning precisely what turns a pure hazard right into a catastrophe. What’s it that makes an earthquake destroy a whole metropolis? Why do some houses keep standing whereas others fall? Why do some neighborhoods flood once they by no means have earlier than? Why do some international locations get well extra shortly than others?

It’s not God. It’s not simply nature. It’s us.

What we’ve come to grasp is that earthquakes, wildfires and hurricanes are usually not, by themselves, disasters. It’s solely when these hazards work together with our communities that the potential for catastrophe arises.

In different phrases, disasters are a results of a hazard’s results on our constructed atmosphere, our legal guidelines and insurance policies, and different selections individuals have made.

It’s not God. It’s not simply nature. It’s us.

This revelation truly is empowering. It signifies that disasters aren’t essentially inevitable. There are issues we will do to mitigate our danger and stop a catastrophe’s worst impacts. We are able to change our actions. We are able to construct disaster-resistant houses and infrastructure. We are able to relocate to locations that face fewer dangers. We are able to change our legal guidelines and insurance policies and make completely different selections to reduce our danger ― from wildfires in California to hurricanes in Texas to sea-level rise in Boston.

Previously, America largely took a reactive strategy to catastrophe administration. We’ve achieved comparatively little throughout the nation to adequately mitigate our danger, as a substitute selecting to take care of the implications of disasters as soon as they’ve already occurred. With a extra complete understanding of the reason for disasters, we’ve got an opportunity to be extra proactive.

The president’s remark provides to an extended historical past of denying or misunderstanding the causes of disasters.

Actually, mitigating our danger is an integral a part of the Federal Emergency Administration Company’s first strategic objective in its plan launched this yr. The necessity for mitigation has repeatedly been articulated by FEMA Administrator Brock Lengthy, appointed by Trump himself. Lengthy, testifying earlier than Congress after the devastating 2017 hurricane season, defined: “Pre-disaster mitigation is the important thing to turning into extra resilient and lowering catastrophe impacts.”

Analysis additionally has discovered that mitigation has actual financial worth. For each greenback invested in federal mitigation packages, $6 is saved in response and restoration.

We all know that stricter constructing codes, land-use insurance policies, neighborhood infrastructure tasks (like levees), and particular person actions (like elevating houses in floodplains) can repay, however we have to put money into it ― and we have to make investments appropriately. That begins by understanding the reason for our danger.

So, when individuals, together with the president, ignore ― or worse, deny ― the reason for catastrophe, our skill to guard ourselves and our communities is undermined. 

The president’s tweet in regards to the California wildfires continues his sample of deceptive, obscuring, ignoring or blatantly denying the realities of disasters throughout his tenure. From his rejection of the official demise toll in Puerto Rico to revoking insurance policies that contribute to nationwide local weather adaptation efforts, the president has repeatedly pushed a brand new wave of catastrophe misinformation.

The information that people are usually not powerless in opposition to disasters provides us the flexibility to make knowledgeable selections to maintain ourselves and our communities protected, particularly as we more and more expertise the implications of the local weather disaster.

Denying our danger doesn’t make it go away. It simply makes it more durable for us to guard our communities.

Samantha Montano has a doctoral diploma in emergency administration from North Dakota State College. She writes at